IPHC-E Repository System

Validation of the Raja Lsteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abenezer Tarekegne
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-15T12:32:37Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-15T12:32:37Z
dc.date.issued 2023-07
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.iphce.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/2011
dc.description.abstract Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, about 100 cases per 100,000 population annually, with a higher incidence in men. Appendicitis is most prevalent during the second and third decades of life, with a lifetime risk of 8.6% for men and 6.7% for women. Implementing an easily accessible diagnostic method could significantly improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, particularly in rural areas with limited access to ultrasound, ultimately reducing mortality and morbidity rates. Objective: To validate the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at three selected hospitals in Addis Ababa from Dec 1, 2022 - Mar 31, 2023. A total of 315 patients who were operated for acute appendicitis were included in the study. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science 23. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score and ultrasound were calculated. A P-value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance, and a 95% confidence interval was taken. Results: Using intraoperative gross examination as a gold standard, the study found that the RIPASA scoring system had 93.1% sensitivity, 22.2% specificity, 92.7% PPV, 23.1% NPV, and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 64.4%. Whereas, the calculated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the ultrasound were 94.4%, 7.4%, 91.6%, and 11.1%, respectively. Conclusion & recommendation: In our study, RIPASA performed at least as good as Ultrasound examination when compared to intraoperative findings of patients suspected of acute appendicitis. In addition to an existing cutoff value, a slightly higher cutoff value (Score > 8), may have a better clinical utility than a lower cutoff value of 7.5 in our patient population. With the aid of further studies, RIPASA may be utilized as an alternative to ultrasound in most instances, such as in rural areas............. Thesis available at Addis Continental Institute of Public Health Library en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Addis Continental Institute of Public Health
dc.subject Non-communicable diseases
dc.title Validation of the Raja Lsteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search IPHC-E Repository


Browse

My Account